The Supreme Court’s questioning of the use of a 1977 emergency law to impose tariffs on scores of countries raised doubt about the centerpiece of the president’s economic agenda.

What to know about the case that could rein in Trump’s sweeping concept of presidential power — or endorse it.

Landor v. Louisiana, one of this year’s highest-profile religious freedom cases, underscores how complex legal protections for free exercise are in the US today.

The Supreme Court late on Friday issued a temporary administrative stay on lower court orders that would have required the government to fully fund SNAP payments for the month of November.

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday over President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs. Trump justified his import taxes under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

In one of the most significant legal cases for President Donald Trump's administration, the Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared skeptical of the president’s claim of unbounded tariff authority -- though some of the justices signaled a potential willingness to give the president some flexibility on foreign trade.

The Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court a federal judge’s order to provide full SNAP benefits for November. The high court agreed.

A majority of Supreme Court justices on Wednesday expressed skepticism about President Donald Trump claiming tariff power from a Carter-era law.

The Supreme Court is expected to be sympathetic to the religious rights of a Rastafarian whose dreadlocks were shaved off by Louisiana prison guards.

In many states, it remained unclear how the Supreme Court’s Friday night order might immediately affect low-income residents.